Claimant, in its Reply, would not contest Respondent’s demonstration in Annex B to the Assertion of Protection which the setting up cost, final cost and various parameters with the YNG auction were being in compliance with Russian legislation and in step with international exercise, and which the actions of Yukos and its management - in blocking

Third, the damages Claimant seeks are according to an analysis at odds Together with the statements in Claimant’s Reply that Yukos' tax assessments were not them selves expropriatory steps. Since the supplemental skilled report of Professor James Dow shows, LECG’s calculation of damages, on which Claimant depends, relies on exactly the same "re